meeting banner

Early Career Opportunities

Mentor Match Up
Mentors and Early Career scientists will have the opportunity to meet during the Science Team Meeting, whether by setting up a virtual hang out, or having coffee, drinks, or a meal together (if both are attending in person). You must register for the meeting and indicate that you are interested on the registration form. The mentoring activity is an opportunity for early career (in school or < 10 years out from post terminal degree) scientists to have an informal interaction with a later career (~10 years or more post-Ph.D.) scientist.

If you are an early career scientist and interested in being a Mentee, provide the following in the registration form:
  • Provide your former institutions, subjects you are interested in, and/or other items you are interested in learning about.
If you are a later career scientist and interested in being a Mentor, provide the following in the registration form:
  • Scientific specialty
The meeting planning committee will endeavor to pair people based on interest or experience.
Early Career Research Highlight Feedback
This year, in place of a student presentation judging event, we have shifted to a feedback model only (no formal judging competition). We offered students and early career scientists the opportunity to indicate that they would like feedback provided on their research highlights presentation. Volunteers attending the meeting (whether in-person or virtually) will review presentations (and any associated posters) and provide feedback based on the criteria below. Because research highlight sessions are happening in parallel, and some participants may be attending remotely, presenters requesting feedback must upload their presentation and associated poster (if applicable) prior to the start of the meeting.


General Criteria For Feedback
  • Focus of the presentation
  • Clarity and coherence of the content
  • Thoroughness of the ideas presented and the analysis
  • Clarity of the presentation
  • Effective use of facts, statistics and details
  • Lack of grammatical and spelling errors
  • Design of the slides/poster
  • Effective use of images
  • Clarity of voice projection and appropriate volume
  • Completion of the presentation within the allotted time frame
Questions to Consider
  • What did the presenter do well?
  • Where could the presenter improve?
  • Is the science clearly and accurately presented?
  • What were your overall impressions?